DailyMe #2018-11-13 英特尔5G 调制解调器进展、新产品营销策略以及欧洲创业公司融资现状
如果你对我挑选的话题感兴趣,欢迎订阅 Dailyio 会员服务,作为 I/O 会员计划的 2.0 产品,Dailyio 将继续通过付费的门槛过滤、筛选读者群体,为优质读者提供全球视野的科技商业洞察。 (更多…)
如果你对我挑选的话题感兴趣,欢迎订阅 Dailyio 会员服务,作为 I/O 会员计划的 2.0 产品,Dailyio 将继续通过付费的门槛过滤、筛选读者群体,为优质读者提供全球视野的科技商业洞察。 (更多…)
如果你对我挑选的话题感兴趣,欢迎订阅 Dailyio 会员服务,作为 I/O 会员计划的 2.0 产品,Dailyio 将继续通过付费的门槛过滤、筛选读者群体,为优质读者提供全球视野的科技商业洞察。 (更多…)
如果你对我挑选的话题感兴趣,欢迎订阅 Dailyio 会员服务,作为 I/O 会员计划的 2.0 产品,Dailyio 将继续通过付费的门槛过滤、筛选读者群体,为优质读者提供全球视野的科技商业洞察。 (更多…)
如果你对我挑选的话题感兴趣,欢迎订阅 Dailyio 会员服务,作为 I/O 会员计划的 2.0 产品,Dailyio 将继续通过付费的门槛过滤、筛选读者群体,为优质读者提供全球视野的科技商业洞察。
推荐《纽约客》这篇特稿文章,文章详细讨论了 AI 给图像领域带来的变革,当图像造假、视频造假的成本越来越低,这个社会长期以来所形成的「眼见为实」的认知也遭遇巨大挑战:
In Farid’s view, the sheer number of distinctive “manipulation indicators” gives forensics experts a technical edge over forgers. Just as counterfeiters must painstakingly address each security feature on a hundred-dollar bill—holograms, raised printing, color-shifting ink, and so on—so must a media manipulator solve myriad technical problems, some of them statistical in nature and invisible to the eye, in order to create an undetectable fake. Training neural networks to do this is a formidable, perhaps impossible task. And yet, Farid said, forgers have the advantage in distribution. Although “Golden Eagle Snatches Kid” has been identified as fake, it’s still been viewed more than thirteen million times. Matt Turek predicts that, when it comes to images and video, we will arrive at a new, lower “trust point.” “ ‘A picture’s worth a thousand words,’ ‘Seeing is believing’—in the society I grew up in, those were catchphrases that people agreed with,” he said. “I’ve heard people talk about how we might land at a ‘zero trust’ model, where by default you believe nothing. That could be a difficult thing to recover from.”
如果你对我挑选的话题感兴趣,欢迎订阅 Dailyio 会员服务,作为 I/O 会员计划的 2.0 产品,Dailyio 将继续通过付费的门槛过滤、筛选读者群体,为优质读者提供全球视野的科技商业洞察。
依图是国内领先的图像识别创业公司,其人脸识别技术也处于行业领先地位,他们的产品广泛应用在银行、酒店等等。
该公司日前在新加坡开设了分公司,依图公司东南亚、港澳地区技术总监 Scott Ong 在接受媒体采访时,谈了他对人脸识别道德观的看法:
When asked about concerns raised over intrusion of privacy and misuse of individual data, he said his company could not access customer data, as it was not the firm collecting the information.
On the debate of individual privacy, Ong said that consumers download applications because they are offered financial returns, such as free drinks or discounts for buying goods.
“How individual data could be used depends on an agreement in society,” he added.
Prinya Hom-anek, a cybersecurity expert in Thailand, said that the decision on adopting facial recognition and other technologies related to AI comes down to privacy concerns.
“If a shop-owner installs a camera embedded with a deep-learning machine that could recognise the faces of everyone walking in or passing by his shop, then what is individual rights. Many may not be happy with it,” he said.
He believed that the technology is being used at some shops in Thailand and the government may install the cameras at airports for the purpose of picking out criminals and those under police investigation among air passengers.
He agrees with Thai commercial banks adopting the technology for financial transactions, similar to some banks in China.
“However, it should be used with tighter authentication requirements, such as an additional pin number in order to ensure customer security,” said Prinya.
The Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA), a public organisation under the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society, is tasked with drafting the data protection law, but its initial draft has met with widespread criticism.
如果你对我挑选的话题感兴趣,欢迎订阅 Dailyio 会员服务,作为 I/O 会员计划的 2.0 产品,Dailyio 将继续通过付费的门槛过滤、筛选读者群体,为优质读者提供全球视野的科技商业洞察。
如果说几年前,巨头还不屑于做低质低价的产品,或者选用不可控的渠道,来收割底层用户的话。那么今天,在一二线市场遭遇增长瓶颈的巨头们,不得不放下了身段。
机会虽然是显性的,但收割起来并不容易。
正如趣头条CFO王静波所言,上市路演中,趣头条团队见了100多位投资人,一二线投资者虽然看好三线以下城市用户对内容的需求,但是并不了解他们的具体偏好。
先是看不上、看不起,随后看不懂,等到人人都能看懂的时候,却已经晚了。比如中低端生活消费品连锁这个赛道,如今成了“香饽饽”,可放在5年前谁都看不上这个行当。所以,至今才跑出了名创优品这么一家。
去年底,网络上小范围内流传了一张照片:高瓴资本的张磊站在中间,名创优品的叶国富与马化腾分立两侧。当时人们觉得这种组合很违和,“大家根本不是一路人”。然而就在今年9月底,名创优品宣布获得腾讯与高瓴资本10亿元战略投资。
今年年初的时候,“乡土服饰霸主”海澜之家也宣布,腾讯以50亿元收购其5%的股份,另有50亿元以建立产业投资基金的形式入股。
类似这种跨阶层的联姻案例,还有京东和趣头条。趣头条的招股书显示,其已经获得了来自京东4000万美元的认购意向。
目前在趣头条上出现最多的广告主正是京东。通过趣头条,京东将按摩椅、烧水壶、男鞋等商品,销售到几乎每一个城镇乡野。其中有些商品的牌子,一线城市的消费者可能从来没在京东上见过。
“五环内”的生意做惯了,走到五环外,尽是巨头看不懂的市场。比如设计过时、价格并不便宜的海澜之家,为什么有人一年要逛好几次?阿迪王这样的品牌,为什么能开出专卖店?30块钱的充电宝,用着不怕爆炸吗?
过去,巨头们看到这些搞不懂的生意,要么抵制,要么回避。但是现在,要么寻求合作,要么亲自试水。
2018 年,线上巨头们纷纷加码了线下零售,尤其重视对农村互联网的渗透,而线下巨头也纷纷祭出全渠道战略,对各种低端流量来者不拒。
淘宝打造出了一个特价版和拼多多同台竞赛,曾经被它摒弃的那部分流量,如今却成了各方争夺的焦点。
今年上半年,关于娃哈哈进军微商的消息甚嚣尘上。人们批评娃哈哈病急乱投,却不知道蒙牛的步子比娃哈哈迈得还大。今年蒙牛已经推出了2款专走微商渠道的新品——慢燃和凝纯,一个主打轻体概念,一个据说能抗衰老。怎么看,都像是保健品企业的套路。
种种迹象表明,带有灰度的、底层的生意正在被拿到台面上,形成巨大的机会,草根创业者有了向巨头传道授业的可能。但反过来看,倘若巨头不再挑食,草根还会有野蛮生长的机会吗?
价值决定于现在,还是未来?